nintendonut1:

dreaming-about-the-fuhrer:

hil-fanden:

its-a-magic-trick:

aslytherinsuperwholockian:

itsdetachable:

mediahascookies:

The new movie,”ParaNorman” features the first openly gay character in an animated movie, and conservatives are not happy about it. The character in question, Mitch, is a muscled jock who doesn’t lisp, mince around, or use the phrase “Hey gurrrl”.
“It’s a time-honored technique of the gay community to hide the fact that a character is gay until the audience has developed a real affinity for him/her, then catch the audience off-guard by divulging that the character is gay. Mitch kicks a zombie’s head for a mile, then reacts with amazement at his own strength.” -William Bigelow of Beitbart.com
Apparently gay characters can only either be flaming stereotypes or assholes.

This part:

If they really were “brave” they’d announce from the start that Mitch was gay and see just how many parents would take their children to see this movie.

Uh, no. I found no problem with Mitch being *gasp* exposed as gay at the end for a few reasons:
* No one ‘outs’ him. At no point does anyone go ‘oh man it’s that gay jock lol” He’s just Mitch. His sexuality does not define him.
* Mitch does not show any sort of attraction to Courtney. At all. If you have the chance to watch the movie again, pay attention - while she flirts her ass off, he doesn’t reciprocate. There’s no bait-and-switch going on - we as the audience might not know that Mitch is gay, but Mitch the character does.
* Mitch is not ashamed of being gay. When Courtney implies a movie night, he says she’ll love his boyfriend, he’s totally into chick flicks. Bam. The end. Either the community they’re in is such that the fact that he’s gay isn’t a big deal, or he’s comfortable enough being himself that bringing up the fact that he has a boyfriend to someone he (let’s be honest here) barely knows isn’t a stress factor.
I do think they were brave - I think they were brave to include well-adjusted, non-stereotypical gay character in a movie with a wide-ranging audience including children, and not make his sexuality be the sole, or even major, aspect of his character. (The major aspect of his character being his care for his brother and his compassion for others, exemplified in his agreement to go help Norman out even though he didn’t know the kid.)

I feel like actually watching this movie now. 

It also defies the “guy gets the girl” endings, too. Or even vice-versa. It’s a wonderful movie, but I think other aspects of it (like the freaky-ass witch and swearing) is not suitable for children. 

I wanna see this movie.

ngl I had a feeling Mitch had some sort of twist to him but I thought it was gonna be like, not only does he play football he’s in the chess club or something
it was a nice twist

I’m still stuck on the fact that more people are freaking out over this character’s sexuality than the fact that a little girl was murdered because she was different.
This movie’s whole story was about facing things you’re afraid of because you’re ignorant about them, and to accept people who are different. The fact that this many people completely missed the point of the story by freaking out over Mitch just fucking blows my goddamn mind.

nintendonut1:

dreaming-about-the-fuhrer:

hil-fanden:

its-a-magic-trick:

aslytherinsuperwholockian:

itsdetachable:

mediahascookies:

The new movie,”ParaNorman” features the first openly gay character in an animated movie, and conservatives are not happy about it. The character in question, Mitch, is a muscled jock who doesn’t lisp, mince around, or use the phrase “Hey gurrrl”.

“It’s a time-honored technique of the gay community to hide the fact that a character is gay until the audience has developed a real affinity for him/her, then catch the audience off-guard by divulging that the character is gay. Mitch kicks a zombie’s head for a mile, then reacts with amazement at his own strength.” -William Bigelow of Beitbart.com

Apparently gay characters can only either be flaming stereotypes or assholes.

This part:

If they really were “brave” they’d announce from the start that Mitch was gay and see just how many parents would take their children to see this movie.

Uh, no. I found no problem with Mitch being *gasp* exposed as gay at the end for a few reasons:

* No one ‘outs’ him. At no point does anyone go ‘oh man it’s that gay jock lol” He’s just Mitch. His sexuality does not define him.

* Mitch does not show any sort of attraction to Courtney. At all. If you have the chance to watch the movie again, pay attention - while she flirts her ass off, he doesn’t reciprocate. There’s no bait-and-switch going on - we as the audience might not know that Mitch is gay, but Mitch the character does.

* Mitch is not ashamed of being gay. When Courtney implies a movie night, he says she’ll love his boyfriend, he’s totally into chick flicks. Bam. The end. Either the community they’re in is such that the fact that he’s gay isn’t a big deal, or he’s comfortable enough being himself that bringing up the fact that he has a boyfriend to someone he (let’s be honest here) barely knows isn’t a stress factor.

I do think they were brave - I think they were brave to include well-adjusted, non-stereotypical gay character in a movie with a wide-ranging audience including children, and not make his sexuality be the sole, or even major, aspect of his character. (The major aspect of his character being his care for his brother and his compassion for others, exemplified in his agreement to go help Norman out even though he didn’t know the kid.)

I feel like actually watching this movie now. 

It also defies the “guy gets the girl” endings, too. Or even vice-versa. It’s a wonderful movie, but I think other aspects of it (like the freaky-ass witch and swearing) is not suitable for children. 

I wanna see this movie.

ngl I had a feeling Mitch had some sort of twist to him but I thought it was gonna be like, not only does he play football he’s in the chess club or something

it was a nice twist

I’m still stuck on the fact that more people are freaking out over this character’s sexuality than the fact that a little girl was murdered because she was different.

This movie’s whole story was about facing things you’re afraid of because you’re ignorant about them, and to accept people who are different. The fact that this many people completely missed the point of the story by freaking out over Mitch just fucking blows my goddamn mind.

©1 year ago with 14,717 notes

#paranorman #homophobia #spoilers

mediahascookies
  1. bowties-are-cool13 reblogged this from mediahascookies
  2. cyndalquil reblogged this from truthhappens
  3. truthhappens reblogged this from innmotioninc
  4. madisonscott11 reblogged this from innmotioninc
  5. innmotioninc reblogged this from ckusma
  6. thegeekylion reblogged this from jeremy-ruiner
  7. deadliestnightshade reblogged this from bowties-are-cool13
  8. queerical reblogged this from mediahascookies
  9. shewillsing reblogged this from lucifers-lawyer
  10. lucifers-lawyer reblogged this from sadlyidonthaveadick
  11. fiftyshadesofqueer reblogged this from cherryjumpersandlove
  12. cherryjumpersandlove reblogged this from bitch-please-im-mello
  13. pumkato reblogged this from 14luckywolf14
  14. 14luckywolf14 reblogged this from stardating
  15. great-seas reblogged this from stardating
  16. stardating reblogged this from femmert15 and added:
    While I do agree that we were caught off-guard with him being gay at the end of the movie, I don’t really see a problem...
  17. fuckitall-andfuckingnoregrets reblogged this from saint-jimmy-loves-us
  18. saint-jimmy-loves-us reblogged this from dreamful-insanity
  19. dreamful-insanity reblogged this from alittleunorthodox
  20. customgender reblogged this from femalemaincharacter
  21. thesnowpixie reblogged this from itsdetachable
  22. alexoncottoncandycloud9 reblogged this from itsdetachable