nintendonut1:

dreaming-about-the-fuhrer:

hil-fanden:

its-a-magic-trick:

aslytherinsuperwholockian:

itsdetachable:

mediahascookies:

The new movie,”ParaNorman” features the first openly gay character in an animated movie, and conservatives are not happy about it. The character in question, Mitch, is a muscled jock who doesn’t lisp, mince around, or use the phrase “Hey gurrrl”.
“It’s a time-honored technique of the gay community to hide the fact that a character is gay until the audience has developed a real affinity for him/her, then catch the audience off-guard by divulging that the character is gay. Mitch kicks a zombie’s head for a mile, then reacts with amazement at his own strength.” -William Bigelow of Beitbart.com
Apparently gay characters can only either be flaming stereotypes or assholes.

This part:

If they really were “brave” they’d announce from the start that Mitch was gay and see just how many parents would take their children to see this movie.

Uh, no. I found no problem with Mitch being *gasp* exposed as gay at the end for a few reasons:
* No one ‘outs’ him. At no point does anyone go ‘oh man it’s that gay jock lol” He’s just Mitch. His sexuality does not define him.
* Mitch does not show any sort of attraction to Courtney. At all. If you have the chance to watch the movie again, pay attention - while she flirts her ass off, he doesn’t reciprocate. There’s no bait-and-switch going on - we as the audience might not know that Mitch is gay, but Mitch the character does.
* Mitch is not ashamed of being gay. When Courtney implies a movie night, he says she’ll love his boyfriend, he’s totally into chick flicks. Bam. The end. Either the community they’re in is such that the fact that he’s gay isn’t a big deal, or he’s comfortable enough being himself that bringing up the fact that he has a boyfriend to someone he (let’s be honest here) barely knows isn’t a stress factor.
I do think they were brave - I think they were brave to include well-adjusted, non-stereotypical gay character in a movie with a wide-ranging audience including children, and not make his sexuality be the sole, or even major, aspect of his character. (The major aspect of his character being his care for his brother and his compassion for others, exemplified in his agreement to go help Norman out even though he didn’t know the kid.)

I feel like actually watching this movie now. 

It also defies the “guy gets the girl” endings, too. Or even vice-versa. It’s a wonderful movie, but I think other aspects of it (like the freaky-ass witch and swearing) is not suitable for children. 

I wanna see this movie.

ngl I had a feeling Mitch had some sort of twist to him but I thought it was gonna be like, not only does he play football he’s in the chess club or something
it was a nice twist

I’m still stuck on the fact that more people are freaking out over this character’s sexuality than the fact that a little girl was murdered because she was different.
This movie’s whole story was about facing things you’re afraid of because you’re ignorant about them, and to accept people who are different. The fact that this many people completely missed the point of the story by freaking out over Mitch just fucking blows my goddamn mind.

nintendonut1:

dreaming-about-the-fuhrer:

hil-fanden:

its-a-magic-trick:

aslytherinsuperwholockian:

itsdetachable:

mediahascookies:

The new movie,”ParaNorman” features the first openly gay character in an animated movie, and conservatives are not happy about it. The character in question, Mitch, is a muscled jock who doesn’t lisp, mince around, or use the phrase “Hey gurrrl”.

“It’s a time-honored technique of the gay community to hide the fact that a character is gay until the audience has developed a real affinity for him/her, then catch the audience off-guard by divulging that the character is gay. Mitch kicks a zombie’s head for a mile, then reacts with amazement at his own strength.” -William Bigelow of Beitbart.com

Apparently gay characters can only either be flaming stereotypes or assholes.

This part:

If they really were “brave” they’d announce from the start that Mitch was gay and see just how many parents would take their children to see this movie.

Uh, no. I found no problem with Mitch being *gasp* exposed as gay at the end for a few reasons:

* No one ‘outs’ him. At no point does anyone go ‘oh man it’s that gay jock lol” He’s just Mitch. His sexuality does not define him.

* Mitch does not show any sort of attraction to Courtney. At all. If you have the chance to watch the movie again, pay attention - while she flirts her ass off, he doesn’t reciprocate. There’s no bait-and-switch going on - we as the audience might not know that Mitch is gay, but Mitch the character does.

* Mitch is not ashamed of being gay. When Courtney implies a movie night, he says she’ll love his boyfriend, he’s totally into chick flicks. Bam. The end. Either the community they’re in is such that the fact that he’s gay isn’t a big deal, or he’s comfortable enough being himself that bringing up the fact that he has a boyfriend to someone he (let’s be honest here) barely knows isn’t a stress factor.

I do think they were brave - I think they were brave to include well-adjusted, non-stereotypical gay character in a movie with a wide-ranging audience including children, and not make his sexuality be the sole, or even major, aspect of his character. (The major aspect of his character being his care for his brother and his compassion for others, exemplified in his agreement to go help Norman out even though he didn’t know the kid.)

I feel like actually watching this movie now. 

It also defies the “guy gets the girl” endings, too. Or even vice-versa. It’s a wonderful movie, but I think other aspects of it (like the freaky-ass witch and swearing) is not suitable for children. 

I wanna see this movie.

ngl I had a feeling Mitch had some sort of twist to him but I thought it was gonna be like, not only does he play football he’s in the chess club or something

it was a nice twist

I’m still stuck on the fact that more people are freaking out over this character’s sexuality than the fact that a little girl was murdered because she was different.

This movie’s whole story was about facing things you’re afraid of because you’re ignorant about them, and to accept people who are different. The fact that this many people completely missed the point of the story by freaking out over Mitch just fucking blows my goddamn mind.

©1 year ago with 14,744 notes

#paranorman #homophobia #spoilers

mediahascookies
  1. i-am-the-alpaca-overlord reblogged this from mediahascookies
  2. my-open-monologue reblogged this from mediahascookies
  3. call-me-when-youre-sabra reblogged this from mediahascookies
  4. misamisaphantomhive reblogged this from mediahascookies
  5. i-am-so-ood reblogged this from mewfrosting
  6. mewfrosting reblogged this from thisistotallynotgospel
  7. thisistotallynotgospel reblogged this from kitsuneclericcn
  8. borderlineextremesleuth reblogged this from a-whisper-on-my-head
  9. a-whisper-on-my-head reblogged this from kitsuneclericcn
  10. kitsuneclericcn reblogged this from mediahascookies
  11. notaveragegreglove reblogged this from mediahascookies
  12. allourloveismadness reblogged this from can-you-just-be-kissing-me-now
  13. can-you-just-be-kissing-me-now reblogged this from mediahascookies
  14. morbidsilent reblogged this from mediahascookies
  15. takemeor-leaveme reblogged this from mediahascookies
  16. cyndalquil reblogged this from truthhappens
  17. truthhappens reblogged this from innmotioninc
  18. mymindisawarmgun reblogged this from innmotioninc